|
|
ENVR 324 Microbial Ecology Winter, 2000 |
|||
|
Instructor: |
R. Christopher Barry, Ph.D., P.E. |
|
Office: |
602 Nesbitt Hall |
|
Office Hours: |
2:00-5:00 PM Tuesdays and Thursdays, and by appointment |
|
Class Meetings: |
Wednesdays, 6:00-9:00 |
|
Required Textbook: |
Microbial Ecology, by R.M. Atlas and R. Bartha, 4th edition, Addison Wesley Longman, 1998, ISBN 0-8053-0655-2 |
Grading:
Any delays in completing assignments should be brought to instructor's attention BEFORE the due date or exam date! Course grades will be assigned based on the following distribution:
|
Weekly Journal Reviews |
|
|
Midterm Exam |
|
|
Final Exam |
|
|
Research Proposal |
|
NOTE TO STUDENTS REGISTERED FOR 4.5 credit hours of MICROBIAL ECOLOGY: You must schedule an appointment to meet with the instructor to discuss additional research activities to be completed during the term. These activities will count 15% towards your final grade, and the midterm, final and proposal will each count 25%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 5 |
Introduction, Evolution and Biodiversity |
Chapters 1 and 2 |
|
|
Jan 12 |
Population Interactions |
Chapters 3, 4 and 5 |
|
|
Jan 19 |
Microbial Communities and Ecosystems |
Chapters 6 and 7 |
|
|
Jan 26 |
Communities & Ecosystems (cont'd) |
Chapters 8 and 9 |
|
|
Feb 2 |
To be announced |
|
|
|
Feb 9 |
MIDTERM EXAM (1 hour) |
Chapters 10 and 11 |
|
|
Feb 16 |
Biodegradation and Waste Treatment |
Chapters 12, 13 and 14 |
|
|
Feb 23 |
Energy Recovery, Disease Control |
Chapters 15 and 16 |
|
|
March 1 |
To be announced |
|
|
|
March 8 |
Panel Review |
|
|
|
Date to be announced |
Final Exam |
|
Text: Atlas and Bartha: Microbial Ecology, 4th Edition, 1998 (Addison Wesley)
Winter, 2000, Dr. Barry
Writing and evaluating proposals is a central activity both in private industry and in academic research. This exercise provides students with an introduction to grant writing, and the evaluation process used to judge which grants will be funded. Over the course of the term, students will prepare a research proposal using the guidelines provided by the National Science Foundation (NSF) in their Grant Proposal Guide. This guide can be downloaded at the following URL:
http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?gpg
The proposals will be in response to an NSF program announcement released sometime in the past year, and will focus on topics related to microbial ecology. A listing of recent program announcements may be found at
http://www.nsf.gov/home/programs/recent.htm
Examples of programs specifically targeted at microbial ecology include the Microbial Observatories, Biocomplexity, and Life in Extreme Environments (Lexen) programs
http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf0021
http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf0022
http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf9943
Many broader programs also exist, such as Technology for a Sustainable Environment and those related to polar exploration
http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf9993
http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf99108
Your proposal could be directed towards any of these announcements, or to others that are appropriate for research into environmental microbiology. The announcements must come from the NSF, however.
After reading the announcements, you will have to develop a research idea and prepare the proposal for completion of the research. To keep project development on track, you are required to submit your topic by the date indicated on the class schedule so the instructor can review your choice. You must also submit a copy of the program announcement you are responding to at this time as well. Later in the term you must submit the outline you will use in preparing your project description. Your final document will include budget information, PI qualifications, and other related material as well as the 15 page project description. Students are forewarned that these additional documents may take considerable effort to prepare.
Project summaries (analogous to abstracts) will be distributed to all class members, and three will receive your entire proposal for review. One individual will lead class discussion (in your absence) and will provide comments and an evaluation similar to that which you would receive from the NSF. All students will be lead reviewers for at least one proposal. Grading will be at the discretion of the instructor, although student observations will be considered in assigning a grade.