From jon@cbis.ece.drexel.edu Mon Apr 25 23:42:23 2005 Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 23:37:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Jonathan Hoult To: paul.yu.oh@drexel.edu Subject: MEM-800 002 (Oh, Paul):Course Eval Results Course Evaluation

Please not that Lecture/Recitation sections were surveyed differently this term. This applies only to some courses, most of which are in TDEC. The course objective report is displayed in with the lecture section designated by section A, B or C. If the course had a lecture/recitation format and this report does not have numeric results for course objectives, they can be found on the web at http://eval.coe.drexel.edu under the lecture section.

Course instructors are urged to complete the Faculty Response Form FRF_HERE Printed or electronic copies should be submitted directly to the department head for Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) review. No other administrators have access to completed Faculty Response Forms.


COE Winter 2004 - 2005 Course Evaluation Results


 MEM-800  002  Special Topics Mech Engr  Oh, Paul

 Responded
4

 Not Responded
0

 Response Rate
100%
 Instructor's Dept
Not Available

Course/Faculty Assessment

5=Very Great Extent, 4=Great Extent, 3=Moderate Extent, 2=Limited Extent, 1 = Not At All

 

 Avg

Std Dev
 

 Avg

 Std Dev
Teamwork or group projects and assignments were an integral part of this course

0.5

0.5
The instructor was well prepared for the lectures

5.0

0.0
The course had a multi-disciplinary perspective

2.5

2.5
The instructor's communication skills were good

5.0

0.0
Computer technologies were used to enhance my learning

3.8

2.2
The instructor's attitude toward the students was positive and helpful

5.0

0.0
The course objectives and requirements were clearly communicated

3.5

2.1
The instructor provided timely feedback on student performance

5.0

0.0
What is your overall rating of the course? (5=outstanding, 3=average, 1=poor)

3.5

2.1
What is your overall rating of the instructor? (5=outstanding, 3=average, 1=poor)

4.8

0.5
What is your rating of the textbook used in this course? Your textbook comments can be typed below. (A = outstanding, C = average, E = poor)

0.0

0.0
What grade do you expect to get from this class?

3.8

2.2

 

Course Comments
1

Great use of hardware for learning...but this was a big problem. It is hard to get everything to work, but isn_t that part of learning_

2

S: This course exposed students to different modalities of advanced controls. S: It was very beneficial to work with a system as simple as a pendulum in order to implement these control methods.

 

Instructor Comments
1

Dr. Oh handled this course very well even though there were several technical difficulties.

2

Good instructor.

 

General Comments / Suggestions
1

Teach it again...a lot of bugs seem to have been worked out the first time through.