COE Spring 1999-2000 Course Evaluation Results


Course instructors are urged to complete the Faculty Response Form (PDF or Word). Printed or electronic copies should be submitted directly to the department head for Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) review. No other administrators have access to completed Faculty Response Forms.

 MEM-640  501  Real Time Microcomp Ctrl II  Oh, Paul

 Responded
11

 Not Responded
1

 Response Rate
92%
 Instructor's Dept
Not Available

Course/Faculty Assessment

5=Very Great Extent, 4=Great Extent, 3=Moderate Extent, 2=Limited Extent, 1 = Not At All

 

 Avg

Std Dev
 

 Avg

 Std Dev
Teamwork or group projects and assignments were an integral part of this course

4.5

0.7
The instructor was well prepared for the lectures

4.9

0.4
The course had a multi-disciplinary perspective

4.7

0.5
The instructor's communication skills were good

5.0

0.0
Computer technologies were used to enhance my learning

4.6

0.7
The instructor's attitude toward the students was positive and helpful

4.9

0.3
The course objectives and requirements were clearly communicated

4.2

1.1
The instructor provided timely feedback on student performance

4.6

0.5
What is your overall rating of the course? (5=outstanding, 3=average, 1=poor)

4.5

0.8
What is your overall rating of the instructor? (5=outstanding, 3=average, 1=poor)

4.9

0.3
What is your rating of the textbook used in this course? Your textbook comments can be typed below. (A = outstanding, C = average, E = poor)

3.0

1.4
What grade do you expect to get from this class?

4.4

0.7

 

Course Comments
1

course offered practical information that you could use at work. the only problem was the lack of hardware. We didn't have enough working computers, power supplies, etc. That fact slowed down the lab tremendously.

2

Make up classes or just post the lecture on the web

3

strength=hands on eperience

4

good intro to electronics for mechanical engineers.

5

The hands-on experience is definitly the strongest part of the course. The problem lies in the schedule of holidays falling on ths same day. Three holidays and two snowdays cut the term in half for us and I believe it severly handicapped Dr. Oh from completing anywhere close to what he had inticipated at the beginning of the term. I believe this issue could arise agian in the future and it should be delt with before more students lose out on the education they expect and pay for.

 

Instructor Comments
1

strength=excellent teacher weakness=tough grading

2

instructor cares enough to make sure all students complete the online evaluation.

 

General Comments
1

Monday's are a bad night for this course. With the university holidays and snow days this term we missed too many days. Would have been nice to spend a little more time on some material and cover more than we did. Otherwise, it was a great course.