|
1
|
- Mike Scheuermann, PhD
- Associate Vice President
– Instructional Technology
Support –
- Drexel University
|
|
2
|
- President Constantine Papadakis
- Drexel University 1995-2009
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- Engagement in online courses can come in the form of asynchronous or
synchronous elements. Faculty often shy away from online chat and
similar features because they fear they will be more work. A few common
myths about synchronous course elements will be shared - from years of
experience and garnering input from students as well as other faculty
members. Practitioners often do not know how incorporating synchronous
elements can take their online learning effectiveness to the next level.
|
|
5
|
- Attendees will learn what students and faculty, across the last few
years, have to say about the value of the experiences they had with
synchronous engagement in their online courses. Most of these insights
come from experienced practitioners and graduate students. Key takeaways
include knowing how to initiate faculty use of these online features,
the value that they will add, as well as the oftentimes positive effect
that they can actually have on faculty workload.
|
|
6
|
- Faculty support staff members, online learning program administrators,
instructional designers, faculty and others using a learning management
system at their institutions.
|
|
7
|
- What faculty, and others, typically have to say about synchronous
elements
- “The Myths”
|
|
8
|
- “Anytime – Anywhere” is the way that online learning needs to be!
|
|
9
|
- “I will never be able to get my students together for any synchronous
online chat sessions!”
|
|
10
|
- “My students will either think it is impossible to do chat sessions – or
– they will not find any value in them anyway.”
|
|
11
|
- “By the way - conducting online chat sessions will be too much work for me!”
|
|
12
|
- Skeletal set of topics to cover during the chat
- linked to the reading assignments
- Students determine the direction of the chat
- Facilitator role:
- alternate topics (aligned with assigned readings)
- heighten student engagement
- energize the conversation
- redirect / correct ~ when necessary
|
|
13
|
- Four scheduled sessions per term
- Two in the 1st half-of-term and two in the 2nd
half
- 7:30pm-9:00pm Eastern time, or,
- 7:00pm-8:30pm Eastern time
- 7-10 participants per session (optimal)
|
|
14
|
- Students are randomly-assigned to the chat nights (based on enrollment)
- Students can switch chat nights
- session-by-session, or, across the term
- Students make “the switch”
- Contact course colleagues and make the switch
- Students advise the instructor of the switch
- Builds learning community!
- Diminishes instructor administrative role!
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
- “NO !! Please do not eliminate these on-line chat sessions. This is a
great way to garner everyone's thoughts, comments, opinions, expertise
and examples of how principles in this course are applied in real world
situations. I look forward to these sessions.”
- “No, I like the chats. It makes me feel like I am in a more interactive
environment, like I am in a classroom setting rather than 100% online.”
- “No, keep these chats, they are very beneficial to the class and
learning experience. They bring a personal feel to this virtual class.”
|
|
18
|
- “I think you should keep it as is, because it allows direct interaction
between classmates and it makes it feel like a class room atmosphere.”
- “No, do not eliminate. This is good, it makes people a little bit more
accountable to this class, and you can hear people answer to questions.
It kept me up to date with the reading knowing that I needed to do this
chat.”
- “NO, I believe that the chat will continue to improve and provides an
interesting, classroom type medium, to improve the interaction with
students. Perhaps some student-to-student chatting should be
considered.”
|
|
19
|
- “I think you should keep the chats. Being able to associate a voice with
a response also helps to assume the personality of the individual.
Because we don't meet face-to-face, this voice-contact is important.”
- “No, the chats really made me feel closer to my classmates and made the
on-line class more ‘real.’
Hearing the opinions of others helped increase my knowledge of
each of the subjects.”
- “No. You should keep it. I think the interaction that we have in these
chats is a valuable addition to the takeaways that we receive in this
class. It's a chance for us to get together and actively probe one
another on some topics. You can't get the level and pace of interactive
participation in the asynchronous threads.”
|
|
20
|
- “I would prefer not to do the chats. I like being able to do the course
when I want to and not have to log in at any specific time.” [Winter 2008]
- “I think making it asynchronous would really help as I choose online
classes for their flexibility. but i did enjoy the chat sessions but I
would miss it but I did have difficulties in keeping this time clear of
my schedule.” [Spring 2008]
- “Although I find these Chat Sessions very interesting, I think it should
be eliminated because there may be some students in different time
zones. In addition, Drexel E-learning did not inform applicants that
there will by synchronous chats. So there is some disconnect there. It
would have been helpful to have adequate information.” [Summer 2008]
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
- “I don’t know how innovative it is, but I use Wimba classroom to hold
virtual office hours for our students who are in Sacramento. They log
in, turn their webcam on and we talk as if we are in the same room.”
|
|
25
|
- “Yes... I have used it several times in all my courses this term. The
students appreciate the live atmosphere yet in the comfort of their
dorm, apartment, etc. I have used voice-over PPT and asked the students
to listen to the lecture over a two day period. I thought they would
like this method better than the time-constricted Live Class room. They
did not. They preferred the Wimba class.”
|
|
26
|
- “Wimba Classroom continues to enhance my graduate courses in toxicology
as a method by which individuals can chat with me in real-time during
our weekly 'ToxCHAT' sessions. I have found that if I offer these
sessions as 'voluntary', student participation is still good. I've
done this now for two terms [4 sections] and have found that individuals
who find it helpful will use it...[numbers vary but 1/3 to 1/2 of the
class utilize it regularly].
- I think this is an interesting example of offering flexibility and
watching students respond depending upon their individuals needs,
schedules, and interest in further discussion about the course
materials.”
|
|
27
|
- “Mike, I have been using Wimba on a weekly basis. My students are
enjoying [it] a lot. Some nice features that I like is the capability of
uploading a PPT presentation, and then using my tablet to make marks on
the presentation, and/or write my math equations. Also, I am starting to
use the polling feature. That gets my students excited. And it seems as
though they interact even more after the each polling. It is kind
spicing up the presentation a bit more. Another important feature that I
like is the sharing stuff. I can show my desktop, and walk the
students through a series of computations using a financial calculator.
I have a program in my computer that simulates a financial
calculator's operations. With that said, I was not only able to
teach my students how to set the financial calculator up,
but also carry out time value of money (TVM) computations, bond
valuation, and advanced problems in capital budgeting and M&A as
well.”
|
|
28
|
- Conduct “online office hours”
- Solicit student feedback
- Should OCs be regular parts of the class?
- Try some optional Chat sessions
- Extra credit opportunity, perhaps?
- Introduce a few mandatory sessions
- Regulate the number of participants
- Solicit student feedback
- Should the # of OCs be increased?
- Constantly monitor student feedback
|
|
29
|
- Make-up credit
- Prep for mid term / final test and/or papers
- Student “group work”
- Guest speakers, e.g., “Ask a Librarian”
- Mandatory ~ at a low level, initially
- Provide instant feedback
- Appeal to various learning styles
- Focus on best practices
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
- The conversion to more convenience for students will multiply over the
next decade.
- Students will increasingly expect access to classes from cellular
phones and other portable computing devices.
- They may sign up to take a course in person, and then opt to monitor
class meetings online and attend whenever they want.
- Classroom discussions, office hours with a professor, lectures, study
groups, and papers will all be online.
- Colleges will need to offer those options in addition to face-to-face
instruction.
- Chronicle Research Services, 2009
- Executive Summary
|
|
33
|
- “Participants reported utilizing different types of technology for
different tasks. To establish initial contact and exchange personal
information, teams preferred to rely on a less personal technology, like
e-mail or discussion board. To brainstorm ideas and formulate a problem
to be addressed, teams favored video/audio conferencing with
simultaneous usage of chat to keep track of the discussion and create a
chat log. Teams found audio/video conferencing
essential for making important decisions because
it allowed for immediate feedback and real-time
discussions. (p. 49).
- Karpova, Correla, & Baran, Iowa State University
- The Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2009
|
|
34
|
- “…to facilitate rewarding and meaningful computer-mediated teaching and
learning experience (e.g., distance education, cross-border
collaboration), it is no longer enough to rely on a single technological
solution (e.g., discussion board)” (p. 50).
- Karpova, Correla, & Baran, Iowa State University
- The Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2009
|
|
35
|
- “…educators should consider including interactive components that
utilize both synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated
communication when designing web-based courses” (p. 114).
- Lavooy and Newlin, University of Central Florida,
- International Journal on E-Learning:
- Corporate, Government, Healthcare, & Higher Education Vol. 7, No. 1,
2008
|
|
36
|
- “Certainly, as these results suggest, students will avail themselves of
the opportunity to meet with an instructor and fellow cyber-students
when afforded
a synchronous environment” (p. 114).
- Lavooy and Newlin, University of Central Florida,
- International Journal on E-Learning:
- Corporate, Government, Healthcare, & Higher Education Vol. 7, No. 1,
2008
|
|
37
|
- “Shouldn’t we as instructors, make use of all available tools that serve
to benefit the student in web-based, web-enhanced, and traditional, live
courses? As we continue to evaluate course components, we can better
address the needs of students, thereby increasing the chance of success”
(p. 115).
- Lavooy and Newlin, University of Central Florida,
- International Journal on E-Learning:
- Corporate, Government, Healthcare, & Higher Education Vol. 7, No. 1,
2008
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
- Anytime – Anywhere” is the way that online learning needs to be!
|
|
40
|
- Anytime – Anywhere” is the way that online learning needs to be!
- “I will never be able to get my students together for any synchronous
online chat sessions!”
|
|
41
|
- Anytime – Anywhere” is the way that online learning needs to be!
- “I will never be able to get my students together for any synchronous
online chat sessions!”
- “My students will either think it is impossible to do chat sessions – or
– they will not find any value in them anyway.”
|
|
42
|
- Anytime – Anywhere” is the way that online learning needs to be!
- “I will never be able to get my students together for any synchronous
online chat sessions!”
- “My students will either think it is impossible to do chat sessions – or
– they will not find any value in them anyway.”
- “By the way - conducting online chat sessions will be too much work for me!”
|
|
43
|
- What other approaches do you take with Chat in your courses?
|
|
44
|
|
|
45
|
- Mike Scheuermann, PhD
- Associate Vice President
– Instructional Technology
Support –
- Drexel University
|
|
46
|
- Thank you for speaking at BbWorld ’09.
Your efforts are what make BbWorld an event to remember! A few reminders:
- We’ve included a two suggested slides to help you quickly introduce
yourself and your institution.
- Clients have told us that most effective presentations do not focus on
institution specifics, but rather provide best practices that can be
applied anywhere. So we
encourage you to refer back to the learning outcomes you provided in
your session proposal and focus on those highlights.
- Your session is 45 minutes long – and there will likely be another
session in your room immediately following yours, so please be aware of
the time!
|
|
47
|
- Connections
- Want to share your knowledge with the wider Blackboard community that
can’t attend BbWorld? Want to
start the conversation before you get to the event? Heck, want to encourage folks to
attend YOUR session? Blackboard
Connections will be our virtual hub for the BbWorld Event.
- We encourage you to post your handouts, PPTs, notes, or any other
information to Blackboard Connections either before and after the
conference. Simply go to http://connections.blackboard.com/resources/a9da724c5b/posts
and post your materials in the Best Practices area!
- You must be logged-in to post.
Use your Behind the Blackboard username and password, or if you
don’t have one, create a login!
It’s that easy.
- We also encourage you to post to the discussion board, or other areas
of the BbWorld Connections group – use the community as a sounding
board for your ideas or give a teaser of your session.
|
|
48
|
- As the state's flagship school/district/university, the YOUR NAME HERE
educates (WHO?). We were named one of the top "green
universities" in the country. Our top institutional concerns are X,
Y and Z.
- Students: #Number
- Geography: Where your students
are from
- Products Used: What
Blackboard/other software products are important in context of your
presentation?
- Other important information about your institution/school/district
- Speaker(s) is the (title/team) that focuses on (project). Brief intro of your role(s).
|
|
49
|
- Who wants to print out a handout?
Instead, check out my posts on the BbWorld ’09 Discussion Board
at Blackboard Connections (http://connections.blackboard.com). I’ve
posted:
- My PPT
- Handouts
- Rubrics/Tools/????
- Discussion board posts on this topic
|
|
50
|
- Mike Scheuermann, PhD
- Associate Vice President
– Instructional Technology
Support –
- Drexel University
|
|
51
|
- Dr. Scheuermann is the Associate Vice President, Instructional
Technology Support, in Drexel's IRT department. In this role, Mike is
responsible for directing and managing client services and desktop
support, user support and training, web-based software development, the
integration of electronic resources with academic departments, myriad
online learning initiatives, investigating emerging technologies, and
outreach initiatives with Drexel’s partner schools and affiliated
institutions. He has been an adjunct faculty member, teaching online
graduate-level courses, since 2000, in the College of Business, the
College of Engineering, and the School of Education. He earned a Masters
degree in Organizational Dynamics from the University of Pennsylvania
and a Doctorate in Education from Drexel University, focused on
nontraditional undergraduates.
|