|
|
Psych 101:
Introductory Psychology Lab
|
Individual Research
Project Guidelines
(Note: This can be a Group Research Project if you
prefer. You may work in groups of 2 or 3.)
1. Choose a topic that you find interesting which
would be of interest to your fellow students.
- Choose something in the area of human
behavior which interests you. If you have trouble thinking of a
topic, browse through your Psych 101 textbook or other
sources.
- Make your topic something which can be
researched within the Drexel community. Subjects may be from
outside the community if discussed with your Lab
instructor.
- Do not consider any project which involves the
administration of mind or mood altering drugs, including alcohol,
marijuana, or any other controlled substance. No such topics will
be accepted.
- You may use MacLaboratory software to design
an experiment. You may use those which we used in class, or
programs we have not used. However, you can not replicate an
experiment conducted in class. For example, you might test to see
how different types of people compare on mirror tracing or pursuit
motor tasks but you cannot test to see the effects of distraction
on mirror tracing. Do people who play the piano do better on
certain tests? How about athletes?
- If you are comfortable with computers, design
your own program to measure some trait not covered by the
MacLaboratory software. But remember, We are looking for good
research design and methodology rather than for elaborate
programming technique.
- Quasi-experimental methods, such as the
naturalistic Observation or the Survey Technique may also be used.
See pages 295-302 for suggestions on surveys.
2. Proposal: Each student, or group
of researchers is required to hand in a proposal. All topics must be
approved by your Lab Instructor. The following should be included in
your proposal:
Hypothesis
Independent and
Dependent Variables
study design (within
subject , between subject, etc.)
your sample
methods
statistical test of
significance.
The purpose of the proposal is to make sure
everyone is on track, and attempting to conduct a testable
experiment, given the time constraints and level of experience of the
students.
3. Background research
on your topic:
- a. What: Each student is
required to have at least two outside references, one of which
much be a journal article. Groups of two or more students are
required to have at least four references, two of which must be
journal articles. Journal articles must come from scientific
journals only--Psychology Today and Glamour are not scientific
journals. Your journal article(s) can include past experiments
which were similar in nature to the present experiment, or
articles in support of the basic theory behind your hypothesis.
They must be fully discussed in your introduction - see below.
Each article cited should be entered into the Reference Section of
your paper, in the format outlined by the APA in the Lab Manual.
The two sections which should contain information from your
references are the Introduction and Discussion section. You must
first discuss the article in the Introduction section to be able
to mention it in the later discussion section. You will be
required to provide evidence of your research by handing in the
first page of each article you cite in your final paper.
- b. How: To facilitate your
research, you may use several sources found at the library. The
library offers PsycLit which is a database on CD ROM, on which you
can type your topic or keywords to find relevant research. Ask
your librarian if you have questions on how to use psyclit. Drexel
does not have many Psychology Journals so you may need to go to
Penn's Library to locate the correct journal.
4. Operationalize
variables: Operationalize your Independent
and Dependent Variables. This means to define the concept you are
studying. For example, if you are looking at intelligence, define
what it means, and how you are measuring it. You may want to use a
standardized IQ test. Another example would be to use scores
generated by the mirror tracing task to measure performance on motor
task.
5. Sample: First, identify the
population you are interested in studying. Next, choose a method of
acquiring a sample of this population. Random sampling will lead to
the most representative sample of your population, however we realize
the difficulty of obtaining a random sample. If you use a
between-subject design your groups should be as equivalent as
possible except for the manipulation of the Independent variable.
Minimum Number of Subjects: One Experimenter 10
subjects
Two or Three Experimenters 20 subjects
6. Data
Collection: Begin to collect your data
from the sample. If more than one experimenter is conducting the
study, have the same investigator manipulate the independent variable
for all subjects, or give the survey, whichever the case may be. Have
each subject tested under similar circumstances. This will reduce
error.
7. Statistical
Analysis: Once the data has been
collected, perform your statistical analysis, including a test of
significance, measures of central tendency, measures of variability,
and any other tests relevant to your experiment.
8. Write
Report: Follow the guidelines listed in
below and in your lab manual:
What the IRP should
include:
- Your paper should be a minimum of 5 pages in
length. If two or more individuals are working together on this
experiment the report should be 8-10 page pages. (Note: This does
not include the title page, reference page, or appendices.)
- Papers will be graded on both content and
format. Your grade will not be affected by failing to prove your
hypothesis, as long as the experiment was conducted properly, and
to the best of your ability. You will, however, be graded on the
content of your paper, including all of the information outlined
below. You will also be graded on the format of the paper; this
includes spelling and grammar as well as proper headings and
sections. Do not rely on spellcheck, as it will not pick up errors
which are correctly spelled. If English is not your first
language, be sure to have a friend proofread your paper, or get
help from the Writing Center at Drexel. If necessary, your Lab
Instructor will review your papers with your prior to the due date
to guide you through any problems. Sloppy or careless work will
not be tolerated.
- Reports of empirical studies typically consist
of distinct sections that reflect the stages in the research
process. You should be familiar with most of these sections, as
you have written most for various homework assignments. Your paper
should be divided into these sections with the following
headings:
A. Title: A title should summarize
the main idea of the paper simply and clearly. It should be a concise
statement and should identify the actual variables and theoretical
issues under investigation.
- Author's name and affiliation: Every
manuscript has a by-line consisting of two parts: The author's
name and the author's institutional affiliation, which in this
case is Drexel University.
- Running Head: An abbreviated version of the
title that is printed at the top of the pages of a published
article to identify the article. The head should be a maximum of
50 characters, including letters, punctuation, and spaces.
B. Abstract: A brief comprehensive
summary of the contents of the article, 100-150 words. It allows the
reader to survey the contents of an article quickly. An abstract
reflects the purpose and content of the manuscript, without reporting
evaluations or comments.
C. Introduction: The introduction
presents the specific problem under study and describes the research
strategy (not its methods). This is the section where you summarize
the reference articles that you read. Contain all information
regarding prior research and research strategy here. Before writing
the introduction, consider:
- Is there a theoretical basis for your topic
and hypothesis? What is it?
- What is the point of the study? What
question(s) do you hope to answer?
- How does the hypothesis relate to the
problem?
- How does the study relate to previous work in
the area? (This is the area to include your research
articles).
D. Methods: describes in detail how
the study was conducted. It permits experienced investigators to
replicate the study if they so desire. In the Methods section, there
are three subsections that must be labeled:
- Subjects: This
subsection answers three questions: 1) Who participated in the
study? 2) How many participants were there? 3) How were they
selected ?
- Apparatus: This
subsection briefly describes the apparatus or materials used and
their function in the experiment. Standard laboratory equipment,
such as furniture, stopwatches, or screens can usually be
mentioned without detail. Identify specialized equipment (such as
Apple Macintosh Centris 610 Computer) by the firm's name and model
of the equipment. Complex or custom made equipment should be
illustrated by drawing, photo, or schematic. Test used, for
example the Mirror Tracing computer program, should be named and
cited, and there should be an explanation of what they are testing
for and why.
- Procedure: This
subsection summarizes each step in the execution of the research.
Include the instruction to the participants, the formation of the
groups, and the specific experimental manipulations. Summarize or
paraphrase instructions, unless they are unusual or compose an
experimental manipulation, in which case they may be presented
verbatim. This section should also include the independent and
dependent variable as well as controlled variables.
E. Results: This section summarizes
the data collected and the statistical treatment of them.
- Data Analysis: Descriptive statistics are
useful pieces of information to report. Both measures of central
tendency (mean, median, mode) and variability (range, standard
deviation) can be applied to the subjects in your sample and to
the data you collect on your dependent variable. It is not
necessary to define these descriptive statistics, only to report
what their value is. Everyone MUST perform a test of significance
on the data s/he collects on the dependent variable. Most IRP's
will be able to use either the Sign test or the Mann-Whitney U
Test, which are covered in your lab manual. If you think your
experiment cannot use one of these, or if you are at all uncertain
about which test to use, please go to your Lab Instructor and ask
for assistance. There will be a substantial penalty for an IRP
with no test of significance.
- Reporting of findings: Briefly state the main
results of findings. Report the data in sufficient detail to
justify the conclusions. Be sure to make a written statement in
this section regarding the significance (or lack of) of the test
you used. Be sure to state the p-level if you get a significant
result. Discussing the implications of the results is not
appropriate here. Mention all relevant results, including those
that run counter to the hypothesis. Do not include individual
scores or raw data. Tables and Figures (pictures and graphs) are a
good way to present information to the reader in a summarizing way
. However, the charts or graphs do not take the place of results
explained in sentence form.
F. Discussion: This includes an
interpretation and discussion of the implications of the results, as
well as suggestions for future research in this area.
- Open the discussion with a clear statement of
support or nonsupport for your original hypothesis. For example,
if your hypothesis is "Scores under the quiet condition will be
higher than scores under the distracted condition", and your
statistical analysis yielded a significant result, then you might
say, "The hypothesis that scores under the quiet condition will be
higher than scores under the distracted condition was supported by
the results. Therefore, it can be concluded that distraction did
in fact impede performance". Of course, a similar statement should
be made for insignificant results which reflect an unsupported
hypothesis.
- Similarities and differences between your
results and the work of others (references) should clarify and
confirm your conclusions. In general, be guided by these
questions:
1. What have I contributed?
2. How has my study helped to resolve the original
problem?
3. What conclusions and theoretical implications
can I draw from my study?
4. Were any variables not controlled for in this
study which could have increased the level of error?
5. What can I suggest to future researchers
interested in this area, given the strengths and weaknesses of the
present experiment?
G. References: All citations in the
manuscript must appear in the reference list, and conversely, all
references must be cited in the text. In other words, If an article
is referenced in this section, it must have been discussed in the
text. Use APA format for writing both cites (in the text) and
references. See pages 316-317 in your lab manual.
H. Appendix:
An appendix, although seldom used, is
helpful if the detailed description of certain material is
distracting, or inappropriate to , the body of the paper. Some
examples of material suitable for an appendix are: a new computer
program, specifically designed for your research and unavailable
elsewhere; a list of stimulus material - examples of questionnaires
or release forms. Include an appendix only if it helps readers to
understand, evaluate, or replicate the study.
9. Late IRP's will not
be accepted unless special arrangements have been made with your Lab
Instructor and approval is granted far in advance of the due
date.
10. IRP Presentations:
Prepare a five to ten minute presentation
of your experiment including explanation of the following:
- Your topic of investigation and background
research
- Your hypothesis and variables
- The number and description of your
subjects
- A brief, but complete account of your
procedures
- The statistics you used to evaluate your
hypothesis and the significance (if any) of the result
- Your conclusions, including whether or not
your hypothesis was supported, any problems you had, and possible
improvements to your procedure.
Do not simply read your paper to the class. If you
need notes, use index cards, or other similar guides. You may want to
prepare a transparency to present with your results, or perhaps use
the computer overhead to show graphs, etc. from your own disk. Please
see your Lab Instructor for more suggestions.
Be prepared to respond to questions from the rest
of the class, and from your Lab Instructor.
Amendments and changes in these guidelines are at
the discretion of your Lab Instructor.
|
|
IRP
Checklist
|
|
|
Title, including name and section
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Introduction with at least 2 citations from scientific
journals (4 for team projects)
|
|
|
Methods with Subjects, Apparatus, Design and Procedure
|
|
|
Results with descriptove and inferential statistics
|
|
|
Discussion with implications of results, applications to
the "real world", and faults with study
|
|
|
References in APA style
|
|
|
Appendix (optional- if you have a measure you created,
etc.)
|
|
|
First page of journal articles (source, abstract, part of
intro.)
|
|
|
Approved IRP proposal
|
For questions and comments contact me at: kelly@drexel.edu
Last update: 24 June
1998