Part 1:
Choose two of the three terms listed below. Define each term chosen and explain
its importance to medical ethics in a short paragraph or so. Each will be worth
25% of the total grade.
Example: Clinical Death - This is the term for the cessation of heart and lung function. It is the traditional definition of death. It is important to medical ethics because many people can be revived from this state and technology is now capable of taking over these functions for the body. So, breathing and the presence of a pulse are no longer accurate measure of whether or not a person is permanently dead. Yet, some people only accept this definition of death. Thus, for them, death may be reversible, or with the use of technology even avoidable.
The terms will be chosen from the following list:
Argument Slippery slope
Prejudicial Language Strawperson
Begging the Question False Dilemma
Professionalism Professional Autonomy
Professional Code of Ethics Six Step Process of Decision-Making
Duties Rights
Positive and Negative Rights Motive
Intention Metaethics
Normative Ethics Deontological Theories
Teleological Theories Nonmaleficence
Beneficence Patient Autonomy
Paternalism Fidelity
Veracity Justice
Absolute Duties Prima Facie Duties
Conditional Duties Kants Categorical Imperative
Utilitarianism Virtue Ethics
Relativism Ethics of Care
Moral Agent Ethical Distress
Ethical Dilemma Locus of Authority Problem
Confidentiality 5 Criteria Justifying a Breaching of Confidentiality
Informed Consent Substituted Judgment
Best Interest Expressed Interest
Decisional Capacity Decisional Capacity as a Continuum
Surrogate Decision Maker Designated Proxy
Placebo Right not to Know
Models of Patient & Health Care Professional Relationship:
Engineering
Contractual
Collegial
Priestly
Advocacy
Covenant
Part 2 - Essay: In this part you will be asked to read the case given and answer the question(s) at the end of the case in an essay. The case will be based on issues from the first half of the course. (50% of Exam Grade)
Instructions:
Read the following case summary. Answer the question(s) proposed at the end of
the summary and support your decision(s) with good critical reasoning, which
includes responding to at least one of the main arguments against your
position. The grade will be based on the quality of your arguments, depth of
support, and your knowledge of the issues. REMEMBER THAT YOU ARE EXPECTED TO
EXPLAIN AND SUPPORT YOUR STATEMENTS. (This section is worth 50% of your exam
grade.)
If there is any information missing from the case study that you believe is relevant, make an assumption regarding it. State what your assumption is and indicate why this information is important.